Popular Post Vols21 Posted September 9, 2022 Popular Post Share Posted September 9, 2022 The 1960 playtest had to be stopped because some of the ratings, especially Admin were all at starter levels and it tanked all the meters since we didn't have any Cabinet members above 3 (and very few at 3). I've gone back and reset the ratings based on mid and peak levels where necessary and adjusted the meters back close to where they were. Now we are ready to give this era another go - picking up where we left off. Quick recap: John Bricker (OH) and Paul Lexalt (NV) defeated Senator John Kennedy and Hollywood actor Ronald Reagan to win President in a landslide. Republicans rode his coattails to take control of the House and cut into the majority the Democrats had in the Senate. Long time House Speaker Sam Rayburn lost in the primaries and retired. The Speaker job became a revolving door as 3 different Republicans held the gavel for a brief time before stepping down for other jobs (like George Bush going to England as Ambassador). Joseph Martin kept the position until being swept out in the Midterms and replaced by Tip O'Neil. The divided Congress spent a lot of money to beef up the military since we are in a Cold War, and also send subsidies to local law enforcement due to mounting tensions and riots in many cities. President Bricker opted not to send National Guard to put down riots but instead allowed the Governors to handle matters and so far that has worked out. There was also a major earthquake in California. President Bricker sent aid which Gov. Pat Brown misallocated (leading to Brown losing his re-election bid) so former VP Nixon was asked to oversee the FEMA efforts on behalf of President Bricker. Supreme Court News: Hugo Black passed away and Felix Frankfurter retired. President Bricker replaced them with Warren Burger and William Renquist. 1962: Midterm elections were brutal for the incumbent President as the new voting laws and 12 years of Republicans in the White House saw the Democrats regain control of the House 255 to 182 (they started 1960 with 232 so they have gained 20 seats so far). Democrats maintain control of the Senate; however, Republicans were elected to more state houses for the first time. President Bricker signs a Nuclear Test Ban Treaty with Russia. Peace breaks out around the world as relations warm with both Russia and China as well as several of our NATO allies. Bricker receives mostly praise for this bold action and taking necessary action to take a step back from the brink of war. Some in the Military-Industrial cabal that former President Eisenhower warned us about thought Bricker's treaty with the Russians was weak and appeasing our enemies. There are looking for a war somewhere, anywhere. I will post the new Cabinet since we made a lot of changes. Currently we are up to the Congress in Session phase and have a diverse number of bills to consider. 9 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vols21 Posted September 10, 2022 Author Share Posted September 10, 2022 New Cabinet: *State Elliot Richardson Treasury George W Romney Defense Robert McNamara Attorney General Samuel Pierce PM Gen Sherman Adams *Interior David M Kennedy Agriculture Clifford Hardin Commerce John W Snyder *Labor Henry Morgenthau HEW Sinclair Weeks wholesale changes as only 3 remained from the original cabinet - (marked by *) and upgrades all around. It was a pain trying to find someone from all the regions and still appease the proper lobbies, but we did alright. Changes to Cabinet Level positions were not as drastic: Melvin Laird steps in as Sec. of Navy Our new National Security Advisor is Lloyd Bentson Former NSA Dean Rusk moves to London and is the new ambassador to England The cabinet now has one 5-admin and four 4's, the rest are 3's (no more 2's!!) Ambassadors have a 5 (Kissinger), four 4's and the rest 3's. Maybe the biggest adjustment saw former Postmaster Caspar Weinberger become the Key Advisor (4 replaces a 2). I started to just swap him and Casey, but still had issue with putting the former spy master over the US Mail. So Sherman Adams was tabbed as Postmaster General. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrPotatoTed Posted September 10, 2022 Share Posted September 10, 2022 38 minutes ago, Vols21 said: New Cabinet: *State Elliot Richardson Treasury George W Romney Defense Robert McNamara Attorney General Samuel Pierce PM Gen Sherman Adams *Interior David M Kennedy Agriculture Clifford Hardin Commerce John W Snyder *Labor Henry Morgenthau HEW Sinclair Weeks wholesale changes as only 3 remained from the original cabinet - (marked by *) and upgrades all around. It was a pain trying to find someone from all the regions and still appease the proper lobbies, but we did alright. Changes to Cabinet Level positions were not as drastic: Melvin Laird steps in as Sec. of Navy Our new National Security Advisor is Lloyd Bentson Former NSA Dean Rusk moves to London and is the new ambassador to England The cabinet now has one 5-admin and four 4's, the rest are 3's (no more 2's!!) Ambassadors have a 5 (Kissinger), four 4's and the rest 3's. Maybe the biggest adjustment saw former Postmaster Caspar Weinberger become the Key Advisor (4 replaces a 2). I started to just swap him and Casey, but still had issue with putting the former spy master over the US Mail. So Sherman Adams was tabbed as Postmaster General. I could be mistaken, but I don’t think regional balance matters after civil war era. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Willthescout7 Posted September 10, 2022 Share Posted September 10, 2022 (edited) 6 minutes ago, MrPotatoTed said: I could be mistaken, but I don’t think regional balance matters after civil war era. Era of terror is when that stops Edited September 10, 2022 by Willthescout7 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matthewyoung123 Posted September 10, 2022 Share Posted September 10, 2022 12 hours ago, Willthescout7 said: Era of terror is when that stops Honestly, it probably needs to stop after the Progressive Era...around WW1. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
10centjimmy Posted September 10, 2022 Share Posted September 10, 2022 2 hours ago, matthewyoung123 said: Honestly, it probably needs to stop after the Progressive Era...around WW1. I think Neocons, right after the most recent realignment Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrPotatoTed Posted September 10, 2022 Share Posted September 10, 2022 It stops leading to civil domestic stability problems after the civil war era. It does potentially lead to party popularity issues until era of terror. Not sure if there’s a historical basis for that. But that’s how V currently has the rules written. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vols21 Posted September 10, 2022 Author Share Posted September 10, 2022 41 minutes ago, MrPotatoTed said: It stops leading to civil domestic stability problems after the civil war era. It does potentially lead to party popularity issues until era of terror. Not sure if there’s a historical basis for that. But that’s how V currently has the rules written. that must be a recent chance (since we started the second playtests). The -1 election penalty in snubbed regions makes sense in a way (especially in the South, but not as sure about the others). Danger is it opens the door to block someone from a region just for that reason (if opposition has the majority in the Senate) 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrPotatoTed Posted September 10, 2022 Share Posted September 10, 2022 31 minutes ago, Vols21 said: that must be a recent chance (since we started the second playtests). The -1 election penalty in snubbed regions makes sense in a way (especially in the South, but not as sure about the others). Danger is it opens the door to block someone from a region just for that reason (if opposition has the majority in the Senate) Yeah, I believe it is a recent change. Even though I've been running playthroughs for three years now, I always reread a section before I run it just to make sure V hasn't changed it recently. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vols21 Posted September 11, 2022 Author Share Posted September 11, 2022 Some history was made when Samuel Pierce was selected as the Attorney General. The Harlem native is a former Undersecretary of Labor under Eisenhower and was appointed as a Judge in New York City by Gov. Rockefeller. Pierce is also an accomplished attorney having successfully argued before the Supreme Court on behalf of Martin Luther King and the New York Times. His nomination met some vocal opposition from a bloc of Southern Democrats, namely Byrd and Thurmond. However, Senate Majority Leader was able to thwart their efforts to sabotage his appointment and he passed the Senate 88-12. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vols21 Posted December 21, 2022 Author Share Posted December 21, 2022 real world issues have kept this project on the backburner for a while, but getting it going again. one thing I did while in limbo was devise some "rules" for deciding Congressional votes (since they are all basically AI driven) and I think the randomized models work pretty well based on the first set of bills. It's easy when the bill helps or hurts your faction,. so it's mostly the more moderate factions where they apply since very few proposals impact them. The moderate faction starts at 50-50 but the bill gains or loses support based on which party proposed the bill, if their party leader supports it or not, and the actual make-up of the faction (we know it's mostly moderates, but is the rest more conservative or liberal). This system was helpful in keeping me from allowing any biases to filter into the results and kept things interesting. They were a true "swing vote" Another facet I tested out was "Presidential pressure/influence" With promises, the President can often sway some fence sitters to his way of thinking (good example is when Ronald Reagan was able to get much of his legislative agenda including huge tax cuts thru a Democratic Congress and more recently Joe Biden worked to get Joe Mancin to back his. (I used a simple approach - the President could roll the number of 6-sided dice that corresponds to his Command rating. a 5 or 6 would allow him to roll again with the number x 10 being the percent of a faction he could sway. example, a 2 means 20% of the targeted faction would defect. Not usually big numbers, but could help in a close vote for something the President really wanted to get passed. (in my first test, he didn't succeed so it didn't come into play). that all being said, I'll start posting some discussion of the proposed legislation and set the stage for some of the back-room bickering that took place. (partly buying some time to allow me to start working on the election process behind the scenes - it takes a while doing this for every faction and state. Can't wait for the actual game so the computer can take over a lot of the tedious processed. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vols21 Posted December 22, 2022 Author Share Posted December 22, 2022 (edited) President Bricker met with Senate Minority Leader Everett Dirksen, Senate Whip Thomas Kuchel, House Minority Leader Charles Halleck, and House Whip Gerald Ford to discuss and plot their Legislative action for the next session. They knew they would need some help passing anything after losing both houses of Congress in the midterms. They thought they could get the votes in the Senate with Majority Leader Johnson’s support of some of the agenda especially when dealing with the pending economic crisis brought about by the massive military spending in the previous Session. However, Speaker Tip O’Neill seemed to have a different agenda in mind with more massive spending bills and even a second New Deal type agenda. They agreed they needed something to curb spending, and President Bricker wanted to also reel in the labor unions (a position that led to his defeat in the Ohio Senate race before running for President). He then invited Senators LBJ and Richard Russell to the White House along with House Minority Leader Jesse Helms and Whip Jim Wright from the majority party- all who were known to have more center- Right leaning views as opposed to the more liberal Speaker, so the President thought he might be able to work out some deals before meeting with the Speaker. Edited December 22, 2022 by Vols21 pic Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vols21 Posted December 22, 2022 Author Share Posted December 22, 2022 (edited) After his negotiations with the Congressional Leaders, President Bricker knew some of the proposals would be dogfights, but was hopeful there would be enough compromise to get important legislation passed while preventing some potentially harmful bills from advancing. Some of the proposals are: Senate Style Bridges: ban required union dues Barry Goldwater: Restrictions on union actions including strikes Jacob Javits: Subsidies for mental health facilities and research Prescott Bush: asked for a National Holiday to honor. Christopher Columbus and the big one Carrol Reece: privatize Social Security Harry Byrd: ban the black panthers and similar militant organizations Robert Byrd: create Fair code for collecting information onindividuals Eugene McCarthy; DC statehood Olin Johnson; create committees to establish national primaries Sam Ervin: Grant funding to police for research Ray Madden: criminalize marijuana Ralph Yarborough: Ban lynching nationwide House proposals Chester Morrow: immigration reform to reduce who can enter the country Shirley Temple: Propose bill to fill vacant judges on circuit courts (adds +1 to random judicial statesmen) Gardner Winthrow: create welfare for needy families John Gurney: regulations on internal affairs of labor unions Sidney Yates: Subsidize costs of raising and selling products on farms Ed Jones: offers to tax producers of farm equipment to pay for the farm subsidies Claiborne Pell: limit child labor in factories Ezeikial Gathings: Also wanted to privatize Social Security (just realized it was proposed twice) Martin Dies: Deport immigrants based on census quotas Daniel Flood: Abolish metallic currency in favor of Fiat currency Hatkey Staggers: Register each adult immigrant with Federal Government some of these are bound to spark some heated debate. Stay tuned Edited December 22, 2022 by Vols21 Missed one 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vols21 Posted December 24, 2022 Author Share Posted December 24, 2022 vs Speaker of the House Tip O'Neill calls his top LT, House Majority Leader Jesse Helms to his office to discuss strategy on the upcoming session. He explains how he really wants to get the Ban on Lynching passed. He also wants to protect the Labor Unions and the New Deal by not allowing Social Security to be privatized. Majority Leader Helms tried not to laugh as he asked if the Speaker planned to outlaw Sunday picnics after church too. "it seems a lot of your ideas just won't go over well with the fine folk in the South, especially my home state of North Carolina. We need to rethink your strategy" This meeting may very well foreshadow the friction we will see in the 1964 Democratic primary as these 2 factions will be battling for supremacy of the party. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vols21 Posted December 26, 2022 Author Share Posted December 26, 2022 Since that meeting with Helms did not go as planned. Tip barks at his secretary to call China right away - "I don't care what time it is there. Get me Ambassador Roosevelt on the phone!!" While he waits, he opens up a care package that he received earlier today from an old friend in Minnesota. mmmmm fresh cheeses. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vols21 Posted January 6 Author Share Posted January 6 Legislation some of the proposals were slam dunks and others more contested. Here are the easy ones: Make Columbus Day a federal holiday - passed with no opposition (my, how times have changed) as did the bill to fill vacancies for federal judges. Grant funding to local police departments: passed house 358-89 and Senate 78-22 Create Committee to establish nationwide primaries passed both by the same numbers (wide spread support after the craziness in the Republican convention in 1960. Federal criminalization of Marijuana - passed 335-32 and 78-22 Subsidize facilities and research for Mental Health passed 317 to 130 and 67-33 Ban Requirements for Union Dues passed 358 to 89 and 65-35 a handful of items never made it to the floor for a vote and were killed in committee: Ban unfair labor practices including strikes (seen as a victory for Speaker Tip) immigration reform - 3 proposals failed to garner any support Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vols21 Posted January 6 Author Share Posted January 6 Legislation part 2 the more contested proposals as it came down to Helms vs Tip in the house and Senator Byrd the leader of the Democratic party in full support of Helms and the conservative positions. Tip relied on statehood friends like John Kennedy who still wasn't too happy that Tip did not support his run for President in 1960 (siding and riding the roads with Humphrey instead). 1) Ban Requirement for Union Dues: 358-89 and 65-35 it passes and Tip sulks 2) Ban the Black Panthers and other militant groups: passes 304-143 and 56-46 3) DC Statehood - Tip sees it as a chance to increase his influence. It gets voted down in House: 143 to 304 4) Ban Lynching Nationwide - some hot debates here. But it also fails in the house 159-278 5) Abolish metaliic currencies - voted down 169-278 6) Privatize Social Security - a real hot button President Bricker called Congressman Howard Buffet and his son Warren to help with the details (Buffet's assistance came at a cost). After much debate and arm twisting - the bill passes the House 278-169 and passes the Senate 65-35. Byrd and Helms are all smiles 7) Farm subsidies: Buffet got President Bricker's support and promise not the veto the bill to help farmers all over the country It passes 281-156 and 67-33 #8) Tax Producers of farm equipment -- to help pay for the subsidies. It also passes by the same margins. 9) Limit Child Labor in factories: what a floor fight!! alliances forged in earlier battles fell apart here in the House, it looked like Tip Oneill would score a big win, but then GA Representative Carl Vinson rallied his side with his debate and then Minority Leader Charles Halleck took to the floor with fiery words that turned the tide just enough. Final Vote: 218 in favor - -219 opposed. The proposal to limit child labor fails. 😎 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vols21 Posted January 7 Author Share Posted January 7 (edited) Faction gains after President Bricker signed all these into law Red Team Will - Traditionalist: 2700 Vols - Conservative: 2350 Tyler - Moderate: 1650 Lars - Center-Left 1100 Orange - Liberal -100 Blue Team Brad - Southern Traditionalists: 5100 Short King: Center-Right: 1750 Murman: Moderate: 550 PMan: Liberal -150 MarkW Progressive, far left: -950 Leader of the Democratic party, Senator Byrd scored major points for his Southern hard-liners. These folks love what the Democrats are doing for them in Congress. Meanwhile, the liberals are not so happy and looking for changes (+2 red) a lot of the point gains came from the Farm Subsidy bill - since it gives 100 pts to every Gov, Senator, and Rep from states where agriculture is king. Those points made half of some faction totals, and turned a few negatives into positives. Edited January 7 by Vols21 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vols21 Posted January 7 Author Share Posted January 7 Senator Harry Byrd and Jesse Helms celebrated their legislative achievements. They laughed that they may have given Tip the gavel to appeal to his ego, but they kept all the power to themselves. They conferred with other power brokers like LBJ and JFK, thanking them for their support on most issues. They all agreed that if the far left factions could have just moderated their positions a little, they could enjoying this bounty of wealth too. The topic of conversation drifted to whether Kennedy had any desires to run for President again. Many in the room wondered if Senator Byrd might also have higher aspirations after working with Johnson and Helms to score such a great success. No one wanted to show their cards just yet. Meanwhile, the crafty Speaker met with confidants to plot strategy for the 1964 elections. Tip said he would personally campaign all across the northeast and upper Midwest to ensure more liberal candidates are elected. "We need to replace these middle of the road guys with Democrats more in line with our way of thinking and only then can we push back on this conservative agenda and control Congress. Plus we need to rally behind a strong, more Liberal candidate for President this time. No more elitist "Kennedy or Reagan dream tickets" we need a man of the people to lead our charge. Now just who will this man be?" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vols21 Posted January 7 Author Share Posted January 7 Appointments to federal circuit courts President gets to fill some vacancies (1 per faction in his party, all selected by a random roll) Trad: "former Congressman" Dick Poff from Virginia (real life VA Supreme court) Conservatives: Former State AG and current LT Gov from SD, Joe Bottum (real life - appointed to SD Circuit court in 1965. so not far off) Center: Jesse Udall - AZ Supreme court (current and real life which he was until 1972) -- his Judicial moves from 2 to 3. Center-Left: John Paul Stephens from Illinois - former Supreme Court law clerk, and currently is a leading antitrust litigator. (in real life Nixon appoints him to Court of Appeals in 1970 and later reaches the Supreme Court - this random appointment in the game sets him up for that)> Judicial rises from 3 to 4!! Liberal: Herbert Brownell - at the urging of Gov. Rockefeller, Ike's former Attorney General from NY gets the nod (in real life, he was considered by Nixon to replace Warren when he retired, but Brownell declined) this feature really helps out in the game as most of these guys were not going to do much else (3 with Jud ratings of 1, which got bumped to a 2 - which won't help them much) and it sets up 2 of them for possible appointments to the Supreme Court in later years. Of course they won't be doing anything in these new roles, but it gives them something interesting to do within the game (and increase their statesman rating a little bit) For storyline purposes, it allowed me to show some power that Rockefeller wields in NY and maybe adds to my in-game "feud" in Illinois between Gov. Stratton and members of the President's faction - as Stephens is not part of Stratton's faction and was not his first choice for the bench. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vols21 Posted January 7 Author Share Posted January 7 Foreign Policy The following Ambassadors were sent to increase Trade Relations Dean Rusk (4) to UK - success Clark Clifford (3) to France - not successful Henry Kissinger (5) to Germany - success Arthur Goldberg was sent to Israel to offer a loan and came close to bungling the negations. not successful These Ambassadors had the daunting task of improving diplomatic relations William Rogers (4) with Spain -- successful! -- improves to 7 Thomas Pickering (3) with Russian - successful! improves to 6 Dean Acheson (4) to Japan - successful - improves to 8 Frankling Roosevelt Jr (3) with China - not successful (came ever so close, 27, needed 25) All in all, very good term for Foreign Relations. With his high level summit, and nuclear weapon treaties, plus the work of his Ambassadors and Sec. State, President Bricker has taken us from the brink of war with Russia and animosity with China to near friendly relations with both. We have a strong alliance with England, France, Germany, Israel, and friendly terms with Japan and Spain. The Cold War has thawed some, but it might not take much to put it back in the deep freeze with a misstep or 2 on the Interational stage. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Vols21 Posted January 17 Author Popular Post Share Posted January 17 update: next step is the elections. I'm working on the sheet to add all the states for the Presidential primaries. one thing I'm going to do differently is run the Congressional primary concurrent with each state's presidential primary (rather than running during the general election). for one, we will get to see the main election and 2) give more importance on key primaries (or upsets where incumbent gets defeated) - plus I think it will be easier to keep up with and report on. that said, I have used a randomizer to select minor candidates for the President's race after going thru each faction leader to determine if they wanted to run as a major candidate. I'll write up each candidate when I get time. Shaping up to be an interesting race 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vols21 Posted January 20 Author Share Posted January 20 The Democratic Primary became crowded as several candidates threw their hats into the ring. The early front-runner is the Leader of the Party, Senator Harry Byrd of Virginia. The 75 year old wants to build on his recent Legislative successes and throwing all his energy into capturing the White House. HIs main rival according to the national press will be former Gov. Earl Long of Louisianna. The 65 year old "Man of the People" is the leader of the left wing faction of the party and a polar opposite the Traditionalist Byrd. We see them clashing often on the issues. Other candidates to watch: Former Governor Pat Brown of California. Liberal rising star in the party despite his setback in the last California state election. He hopes to capture some delegates on the west coast to help Gov. Long's cause (same faction). Senator Robert Kerr of Oklahoma is the Conservative candidate. He is seen as an ally of Byrd's (same faction) and could be a buffer in the Midwest where Gov Long could have some reach due to proximity. Wayne Hayes - Congressman from Ohio (the President's home state - which he hopes to exploit by pointing out some flaws of his fellow Buckeye). At 51, the moderate from JFK's faction is looking to be a consensus builder with voters discouraged by the extreme views of the 2 frontrunners. Senator George Smathers of Florida. The 49 year old Moderate is the youngest candidate in the race. He entered with the encouragement of close friend, Senate Majority Leader Lyndon Johnson. It will be interesting to see if he can capture the delegates of his home state against the 2 front-runners, but those could be pivotal in a close race. lastly, is a man endorsed by Speaker of the House Tip O'Neill who wanted a strong liberal voice to bring the party back to the left and the policies of FDR. Some wanted Senator Jackson from Washington to run, but Tip knew he needed an icon to rally the people behind. He went no further than the "Father of the New Deal" and man who orchestrated Roosevelt's rise to power:James Farley of New York. At 79, he is the oldest candidate and a true longshot, but his job is remind Democratic voters about the importance of the New Deal and try to peel away support from Byrd whose efforts helped "undermine Social Security" when he passed a law to privatize it. Can Farley gain some traction in the northeast and New England states (where our first primary of New Hampshire will be held)? A lot of eyes are on some of these "secondary" candidates to see if they can rise up in the polls, maybe win some states, and if their performance on the campaign trail might enhance their chances at the VP slot if they are unsuccessful in winning the nomination. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vols21 Posted January 20 Author Share Posted January 20 note: 2 of the 5 faction leaders entered the race. the reason for the other 3 not entering: LBJ - wished to focus on the Senate where he feels he can do more good. He deferred to the current Party leader JFK - lost to Bricker badly in the last election and wasn't up to a rematch Tip O - doesn't have any Command points. for the minor candidates, I filtered each faction by command and age requirement. Then I used a random # generator for the number of qualified candidates plus 3 (if the random # was in the +3 range, that meant that faction would not enter a minor candidate, so it left a small chance for that to happen). Once each random candidate was chosen, I tried to think of a logical reason why they would be running (for storyline purposes - the game doesn't care as we saw with a Hollywood actor running last time even though he had shown no interest in politics until then). As I read about them, it was interesting to note that Smathers was twice elected as the Florida "favorite son" so we get to see if his streak continues in the game election. I thought it turned out an interesting mix of candidates for the primaries, but curious to other opinions and predictions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vols21 Posted February 4 Author Share Posted February 4 The first primary state is New Hampshire. Senator Byrd comes in as the front-runner. The early polls give him the edge. But then we come to the big debates: as the front-runner, Byrd took a lot of pot shots from the other candidates. Congressman Hayes of Ohio was scoring points early as he attacked his fellow Buckeye, President Bricker. Then former Gov. Brown got the line of the night when he said that Senator Byrd might very well be "Bricker on steroids". "We don't need someone to the right of Bricker's extreme views, we need someone with a heart and someone who will fight for what is right". Smathers did a good job of sounding Presidential while not taking a definite stand on some key issues. Farley waxed poetic about the New Deal and how we need to expand it - exactly what he entered the race to do. Gov Long seemed to coast along, until OK Senator Kerr sparred with him over his handing of some civil rights riots in New Orleans. Long countered and held his own. Senator Byrd tried to punch back after the many attacks on him, but he seemed to stumble along after Pat Brown's comparing him to Bricker. The papers the next day called Hayes and Brown the winners of the debate and it was no surprise when they said that Byrd was the clear loser and will need to do more to sell himself and distance himself from comparisons to the President, The election is 2 days away, so we will find out how much if any damage was done by the debates and how much it might help underdogs like Hayes and Brown. A snap poll taken by NBC after the debate showed the race has tightened, but Byrd still has a slight lead. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.