Jump to content
The Political Lounge

CE2's 1800 election poll


Who do you vote for?  

21 members have voted

  1. 1. Who do you vote for? (Select only TWO)

    • Vice President Thomas Jefferson - Pringles
    • Bushrod Washington - CE2
    • James Madison - Hestia
    • Associate Justice Samuel Adams - Sean F Kennedy
    • Fmr Governor George Clinton - Zenobiyl
    • Fmr Secy Alexander Hamilton - MrPotatoTed
    • John Adams - The Blood
    • Elizabeth Hamilton - Rezi
    • Chief Justice John Jay - Timur
  2. 2. Who would you vote for (Senate)?

    • Federalists
    • Democratic-Republicans
  3. 3. Who would you vote for (House)?

    • Federalists
    • Democratic-Republicans

This poll is closed to new votes

  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 05/30/2021 at 05:19 PM

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, themiddlepolitical said:

Sec. Henry Dearborn announces support,as he eyes a run for VP in 1804 “whatever may happen this term I know Pres. Jefferson will be right of mind and right of sound decisions, I hope to see us work together as a team”

Fake Federalist. You betrayed Hamilton for a slave fucker

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The measure of a man is what he does with power. —Plato 

                    —Sec. Dearborn

Edited by themiddlepolitical
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Attorney General Amos Singletary  lends the investigatory power of the Department of Justice to the proceedings against Hamilton. He states to the press that “while I may oppose the federal government involving itself entirely in affairs of state justice, this is clearly an issue which affects the entire union and as such must be our first priority.”

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sec. of War Henry Dearborn warns member on congress what a dangerous Vice President could do "We must do this not for political reasons, but for the safety and preservation of the United States of America"

Edited by themiddlepolitical
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A confirmation without problems Mr. President @Pringles

Even if the increased chance of 20 (due to the Senate being in control of the opposition party) your nominees had been confirmed. Do y'all like this rule btw?

As expected Associate Justice Samuel Adams went to our Lord on October 2nd, 1803. President Jefferson must name a successor to his post.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, ConservativeElector2 said:

A confirmation without problems Mr. President @Pringles

Even if the increased chance of 20 (due to the Senate being in control of the opposition party) your nominees had been confirmed. Do y'all like this rule btw?

As expected Associate Justice Samuel Adams went to our Lord on October 2nd, 1803. President Jefferson must name a successor to his post.

 

Abigail Adams will demand that all federalists filibuster and vote no on Jefferson’s replacement, because the seat needs to remain open due to legal reasons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, ConservativeElector2 said:

A confirmation without problems Mr. President @Pringles

Even if the increased chance of 20 (due to the Senate being in control of the opposition party) your nominees had been confirmed. Do y'all like this rule btw?

As expected Associate Justice Samuel Adams went to our Lord on October 2nd, 1803. President Jefferson must name a successor to his post.

 

President Jefferson announces John Randolph of Roanoke to replace Justice Adams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

John Jay opposes impeaching Hamilton.  He rather supports impeaching slaveholder and infidel Thomas Jefferson.

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Timur said:

John Jay opposes impeaching Hamilton.  He rather supports impeaching slaveholder and infidel Thomas Jefferson.

Note that Jefferson was a Deist, and he was called an infidel by the Danbury Baptists (BTW, he was.)

In those days, that would have been more big of a deal than today.

Edited by Timur
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Timur said:

John Jay opposes impeaching Hamilton.  He rather supports impeaching slaveholder and infidel Thomas Jefferson.

President Jefferson reportedly says in a recent White House gathering that John Jay needs to eat some Chocolate Chip Ice Cream, along with any other of the "Impeach Jefferson" supporters.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Timur said:

Note that Jefferson was a Deist, and he was called an infidel by the Danbury Baptists (BTW, he was.)

In those days, that would have been more big of a deal than today.

Wonder why he was never impeached then, yet Hamilton, who is a much more realistic and viable impeachment, already had his life ruined after his affairs. 😉 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Pringles said:

President Jefferson reportedly says in a recent White House gathering that John Jay needs to eat some Chocolate Chip Ice Cream, along with any other of the "Impeach Jefferson" supporters.

(Chocolate chips were not invented until 1937)

John Jay questions Thomas Jefferson's ability to lead the country. He suggests that the hatred against Hamilton is a political plot orchestrated by Jefferson in order to destroy the Federalists, maintain slavery, and appease the South.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Timur said:

(Chocolate chips were not invented until 1937)

John Jay questions Thomas Jefferson's ability to lead the country. He suggests that the hatred against Hamilton is a political plot orchestrated by Jefferson in order to destroy the Federalists, maintain slavery, and appease the South.

That's another diagnosed with Jefferson derangement syndrome. 😛 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Timur said:

(Chocolate chips were not invented until 1937)

John Jay questions Thomas Jefferson's ability to lead the country. He suggests that the hatred against Hamilton is a political plot orchestrated by Jefferson in order to destroy the Federalists, maintain slavery, and appease the South.

Madison condemns Jay's horrible politicization of the Court and attacks against the newly minted President. He asks if Jay has even read the Reynolds Pamphlet. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Pringles said:

Wonder why he was never impeached then, yet Hamilton, who is a much more realistic and viable impeachment, already had his life ruined after his affairs. 😉 

John Jay spreads the allegations by James T. Callender that Thomas Jefferson had an adulterous relationship with one of his slaves and fathered an illegitimate son, and that he seduced his neighbor.

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...