Jump to content
The Political Lounge

Favorable or Unfavorable #23: James Baker


vcczar

Favorable or Unfavorable #23: James Baker  

13 members have voted

  1. 1. Did you read my first comment?

  2. 2. Favorable or Unfavorable #23: James Baker



Recommended Posts

James Baker of TX got his start with GHW Bush in the late 1960s. Although encouraged by Bush to run for elected office, he never did. He's arguably the most influential politician of the late 20th century to not hold elected office. The Age of Reagan could as easily be the Age of James Baker. Philip Bobbitt (Constitutional Scholar, Democrat, and nephew of LBJ) really highlights Baker's ability in at least one of his books. 

Here are his actions:

Baker, James 1976 Campaign manager for Ford
Baker, James 1980 Campaign manager for Bush
Baker, James 1981 Appt Chief of Staff, becoming Reagan's most influential advisor
Baker, James 1985 Swaps positions with Donald Regan, becoming Sec of Treasury
Baker, James 1988 Campaign manager for Bush
Baker, James 1989 Appt Sec of State for Bush, overseeing the end of the Cold War and entire Gulf War
Baker, James 1990 Convinces Gorbachev to allow a unified Germany to join NATO
Baker, James 1992 Appt Chief of Staff for Bush, while also operating as Bush's campaign manager
Baker, James 2000 Manages Bush's legal team during Florida vote recount
Baker, James 2005 Declines Bush's offer to replace Rumsfeld as Sec of Defense (Bush keeps Rumsfeld in place)
Baker, James 2016 Advised Trump to make Tillerson Sec of State
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I find him exceptionally impressive. I think he would have been an amazingly effective president (which I'd find scary considering his ideology), but he's too neocon for me. I also don't like that seemed to be okay with Trump when most Reagan Republicans were distancing themselves. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, vcczar said:

I find him exceptionally impressive. I think he would have been an amazingly effective president (which I'd find scary considering his ideology), but he's too neocon for me. I also don't like that seemed to be okay with Trump when most Reagan Republicans were distancing themselves. 

He was the only Secretary of State to endorse Trump in 2016, Peter Baker and Susan Glasser's book The Man Who Ran Washington was a great deep dive on the incredible career he led and while he was very impressive as an operator, he was a party man to his bones. 

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...