Jump to content
The Political Lounge

Favorable or Unfavorable #27: John Bankhead II


vcczar

Favorable or Unfavorable #27: John Bankhead II  

12 members have voted

  1. 1. Did you read my first comment?

  2. 2. Favorable or Unfavorable #27: John Bankhead II



Recommended Posts

Sen. John Bankhead (AL-D) was the standard conservative Southern Democrat during the time that supported the New Deal because of its popularity among voters, and because it was their party leader's program. This was during that long period from 1890s-1960s when Southern Democrats seemed progressive in regards to the plight of poor whites, but were shockingly regressive in regards to the plight of blacks. Bankhead is probably best known for his work for farmers as seen below. If not for Bankhead's VP candidacy, we would have likely seen a President Henry A. Wallace in 1945 and a much different start to the Cold War.

Bankhead's father, brother, and either his son or nephew (forget off the top of my head) served in the US Congress. His brother William was Speaker of the House but won't be polled as he only has 4 actions. His niece, daughter of Speaker William Bankhead, was a famous actress at the time, Tallulah Bankhead. William and Tallulah were both much more liberal than John Bankhead II. 

His actions:

Bankhead II, John H 1933 Major role in Subsistence Homestead Act
Bankhead II, John H 1934 Bankhead Cotton Control Act
Bankhead II, John H 1935 sponsors farm tenancy bill
Bankhead II, John H 1937 Bankhead-Jones Farm Tenancy Act
Bankhead II, John H 1938 Adds amendment to Agricultural Adjustment Act
Bankhead II, John H 1943 Introduces bill to allow full-time farmers to be exempted from military draft
Bankhead II, John H 1944 VP candidate at Dem Convention; withdrew and helped push Truman over Wallace for the spot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This was a hard pick because his racism isn't captured in his actions. If I were going to vote straight on actions, and if I ignored that final action, he'd get favorable. The final action might be enough for me to vote him down, even without considering racism. I would have much preferred Wallace to Truman in 1945. 

  • Disagree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, vcczar said:

This was a hard pick because his racism isn't captured in his actions. If I were going to vote straight on actions, and if I ignored that final action, he'd get favorable. The final action might be enough for me to vote him down, even without considering racism. I would have much preferred Wallace to Truman in 1945. 

Yeah, all my votes are actions only generally.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...