vcczar Posted September 12 Share Posted September 12 Edward Bates of MO was a significant enough rival in the 1860 GOP nomination that Lincoln named him to the cabinet as part of the "team of rivals," a term used over a century after the time. He was briefly a Know Nothing when the Whigs collapsed. He supported the GOP primarily for reasons other than abolition, although he wasn't pro-slavery. He gave all of his former slaves freedom and even paid for one of them to go to Liberia to start a life there, presumably the former slave's desire. Nevertheless, he was a moderate on the issue, so much so he didn't support Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation. Here are his actions: Bates, Edward 1850 Declined Fillmore's Sec of War offer Bates, Edward 1852 support for VP nom on Whig ticket Bates, Edward 1860 Rep candidate for pres Bates, Edward 1861 Confirmed Att Gen for Lincoln, serving through most of the Civil War Bates, Edward 1863 Disagreed w/ Lincoln on Emancipation Proclamation Bates, Edward 1864 Resigns as Att Gen after being passed over for Ch J of the SC Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vcczar Posted September 12 Author Share Posted September 12 I'll give him the edge for serving during a troubling time and being good at his job. His disagreement on the EP is worrisome, but I won't use that as the focus of my evaluation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShortKing Posted September 12 Share Posted September 12 I rated him favorably only because I am currently reading Team of Rivals and Goodwin spends a good amount of time discussing the risky gambit Lincoln was making in assembling a Cabinet made up of the candidates he defeated and how he needed their cooperation for this venture to succeed so Bates gets credit for that. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OrangeP47 Posted September 12 Share Posted September 12 3 hours ago, vcczar said: I'll give him the edge for serving during a troubling time and being good at his job. His disagreement on the EP is worrisome, but I won't use that as the focus of my evaluation. I'll do the same, though if he had anything to do with that habeus corpus fiasco I'd change my vote. TBH he probably did. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vcczar Posted September 12 Author Share Posted September 12 2 minutes ago, OrangeP47 said: I'll do the same, though if he had anything to do with that habeus corpus fiasco I'd change my vote. TBH he probably did. That was Thaddeus Stevens. You don't have a Justice Dept until 1870, so Bates couldn't enforce anything. He just advised Lincoln on what was legal and what wasn't. Steven's bill argued the legality for it. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.