Would You Support This Reform
Would You Support This Reform?
7 members have voted
-
1. Would You Support This Reform? (*Read my first post before answering*)
-
Yes
-
Leaning Yes
-
Leaning No
-
No
-
I don't know/Unsure0
-
-
2. Which part of the reform do you not approve of?
-
The Exception Clause in general
-
The Opt-Out Clause in general
-
Allowing Congress to mark some legislation "essential"
-
Letting the states, and not the Federal government, decide if a state can apply an "Exception" or "Opt-Out" clause.
-
Allowing the US Senate, and not the states, determine if a state has a "reasonable alternative" that allows application of the Exception clause.
-
Giving the states the chance to make the adjustments to reach the US Senate approved "reasonable alternative"0
-
Deducting federal aid from a state that successfully applies for the "Opt-Out" clause.
-
Allowing the state to recommend their own deduction of federal aid in exchange for the "Opt-Out" clause, subject to the approval of the US Senate.
-
Allowing the US Senate to reject the state recommendation of their own deduction of federal aid and recommend a higher or lower deduction for the state to pay.
-
Requiring 60% of a US Senate vote to mark a bill "Essential" and, therefore, ineligible for "opt-out" or "exception."
-
This would make the US Senate the most powerful part of the federal government
-
This would make the States too powerful
-
Other0
-
-
3. What do you think will happen if this Reform passes and was in effect?
-
None of the states would ever "Opt-out" even though a system is in place for them to do so.0
-
Too many states would "Opt-out" of legislation
-
Most states would apply for an "exception clause"
-
Only a few states would apply for an "exception clause"
-
Congress would mark about every bill as "essential," therefore making it a reform in name only
-
Congress would rarely be able to mark a bill "essential" and some states would abuse the "Opt-out" clause
-
States would start seceding from the Union because the federal government will have loosened its grip.
-
America would basically be two countries -- a union of Blue States and some purple states and a decentralized confederacy of Red states and some purple states
-
Gridlock on legislation would be mostly removed, but tension would increase in the US Senate over debates on what is or is not a "reasonable alternative" or a is or is not a reasonable federal aid deduction.
-
States taking part in federal legislation would prosper, while those that aren't generally will not.
-
States taking part in federal legislation would not prosper, while those that aren't will prosper.
-
The US will lose its prosperity in this system
-
The US will prosper in this system
-
Considering 15 of the 20 states that rely most on Federal Aid are Red States, the poorest red states are not likely to "opt-out" of legislation.
-
This will actually inflame States Rights activists, even though it actually gives the states more control.
-
This will enrage LW Activists because they'll assume a return of Jim Crow laws or worse in the South, even though this reform has checks to prevent that.
-
Red States will want to revote on old laws in order to "opt-out" or "exception clause" these laws.
-
The Senate won't be able to handle its new duties.
-
Other prediction that is positive, neutral, or negative.0
-
-
4. In the future, (distant future) would you play an RPG that has this reform in effect?
-
Yes
-
No
-
Don't care0
-
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.