Mothwoman

Just now, Imperator Taco Cat said:

@mothwoman  would you agree that mixed people get both the powers of whites and blacks and we need to subsequently, by law enforce race mixing?

This comment was made by paraguay gang(yes that was an actual thing, no these are not my real beliefs).

No, when you mix, it dilutes the blood. It like alcohol, you mix water with your vodka to make it last longe rebut it also makes it weaker. Much better to keep each bloodline pure so to speak.

6 minutes ago, The Blood said:

I have never used drugs in my entire life. Most normal people haven’t. But I suppose you wouldn’t know what that’s like since you have to take a cocktail of irreparably damaging body altering medication to make it through your daily life.

11 minutes ago, vcczar said:

What do you mean natural biological differences? 

Also, are you suggesting Southern blacks are better off enslaved (South secedes successfully) than free and equal (does not secede equally)?

Blacks are ON AVERAGE (emphasis because people always try to paint you as a racist when you point these things out) more athletic than other races, just like how Asians are ON AVERAGE more intelligent than other races. Race is real, that doesn’t mean Whites or Asians are better than Blacks and Arabs per se just that, you know, different people are going to be better at different things. It’s true on the micro it’s true in the macro. I’m sure plenty of Blacks are perfectly capable of becoming brain surgeons, just like plenty of Whites are capable of being Basketball stars, but when we think of a brain surgeon we think of a white guy, and when we think of a basketball star we think of a black guy, and there’s a reason for that. Again I am not saying Blacks are inferior to Whites or anything like that, but we can’t pretend that race doesn’t exist. Blacks and Whites are just different, and there is nothing immoral about stating that fact. Blacks are better at physical labor, while Whites are better at intellectual labor BOTH are necessary for a nation to function.

As to your second point, slavery was already on the way out when we seceded. Plenty of Confederates were anti slavery, I’m sure abolition would come just as quickly and a lot more stably if it had been done by the south rather than by yankee interlopers.

1 minute ago, vcczar said:

@Mothwoman How would Southern blacks be better off if the South seceded? 

Black poverty is a direct result of Lyndon Johnson’s Great Society forcing them to rely on the government. A truly southern government would never pass such socialistic tomfoolery. While being aware of the natural biological differences between the races, I’m sure that Blacks would do just fine for themselves if they were allowed to actually work, and compete with one another.

TikTok is a Chinese spyware app designed to collect our data and brainwash our young people into being gender bending homosexual transvestites. Libs of TikTok is a great twitter account all about this fact, really one of the only reasons I use twitter. I wish Tucker Carlson weighs in on the issue soon, he’s really one of the best news anchors on tv these days. I absolutely support a ban on this cesspool of degeneracy.

59 minutes ago, vcczar said:

He first started to lose appeal when he was regularly linking up with Ron Paul, in his "You Need Two Wings to Fly" campaign

I remember that, and I remember how disheartened I was to see Paul working with a far-left Democrat. I voted for Paul all the way back in 1988 when he ran as the Libertarian nominee (It may surprise some users on here, but I didn’t vote for a Republican on the Presidential level until 2000) and supported him in 2008 (I was going to vote for Chuck Baldwin in the general until McCain selected Palin to be his running mate), and 2012 (Romney was too moderate for my tastes, also too Mormon, so I wrote in Randall Terry). I wish Rand was more like his father, but he’s always struck be as… uninspiring.

I like Tulsi Gabbard. She’s probably the only Democrat I would’ve considered voting for in 2020.

16 minutes ago, Edouard said:

I am curious @Mothwoman but, do you know Judith Reisman?

The name is vaguely familiar, was she involved in some sort of obscenity trial in… I think it was the 80s? Other than that, I don’t know who she is. Should I?

1 hour ago, Cenzonico said:

 

Great video, and great channel! Thanks for turning me on to this guy!

16 minutes ago, Imperator Taco Cat said:

Farming (with lots of slavery) vs industry (now with wage slavery)

“Wage Slavery” You use the same terminology as the communist freaks everyone used to bully in high school. Comrade Lincoln would be proud of you.

14 minutes ago, Imperator Taco Cat said:

Didn't you call nixon one of the best presidents yesterday? He also ended the gold standard.

No one’s perfect. Trump is the best President of my lifetime, but he still signed that awful crime bill.

12 minutes ago, Pringles said:

Do tell, the distinctions between the North and South’s economic system. 

The north was controlled by large industrialists, and financiers, while the south was an agrarian society made up of yeoman farmers, and a few large cash crop plantations.

28 minutes ago, The Blood said:

What Southern culture cherished:

The civil war wasn’t about slavery. Lincoln did not support abolition until such a time came when it was politically opportune to do so. The south seceded in opposition to an economic system which vastly favored northern industrialists at the expense of southern farmers. Lincoln supported that economic system, and the south decided that they had had enough of being treated like second class citizens.

38 minutes ago, themiddlepolitical said:

Yeah my jaw dropped, I had to re read it 3 times.

Why? Both Johnson, and Lincoln did more to destroy traditional values, tear up the constitution, and expand the federal government than any other President.

Johnson’s Great Society ruined the federal budget by giving billions of tax dollars to lazy bums, young bucks, and welfare queens. His civil rights program trampled both states rights, and the rights of private citizens. During his term the Warren court kicked their leftist judicial activism into high gear, though we can’t blame him entirely as many of the appoints were made by his predecessors, though he did appoint the grossly unqualified Thurgood Marshal to the bench, passing over many good candidates in the process (wonder why?). His signing of the 1965 naturalization act is why America is no longer recognizable in many parts of the country. His one saving grace was that he was his foreign policy which was fervently anti communist.

Now let’s get to Lincoln, the man who did more to rip up the constitution, and divide the country than anyone. When the southern states decides that they did not wish to be ruled by a proto-socialist tyrant in waiting who opposed everything their culture cherished, he wasted no time in establishing himself as a tyrant. Lincoln used the military to harass, and shut up everyone who opposed him, suspended habeas corpus, confiscated private property, took the nation off the gold standard, and left the tenth amendment to die by passing bills, and amendments that allowed the federal government trample the rights of states. What was the benefit of all this warlord like control? Take a look at New York City, Chicago, and Detroit if you want an answer.

The second question was tough, both were awful Presidents, but I voted Johnson because I support the Vietnam war in general, though a more aggressive President (like Barry Goldwater would have been) would have ended the war successfully before fifth columnist hippies were able to erode American willpower, and force us to leave South Vietnam to the communists.

4 minutes ago, Eugene said:

mothwoman rn:

 

 

My father, while serving in the 30th Infantry Division in 1944 as part of the allied campaign to liberate France, was robbed of his legs by a Nazi artillery shell. To compare me to the scum who did that to him is insulting, and evil. Eat shit.

1 hour ago, The Blood said:

I'd want to kill myself if I were you, considering that repeated studies and research on trans people, much compiled by Cornell University in this helpful meta-analysis, reveals that gender-affirming healthcare and social acceptance massively improve mental health outcomes for the transgender community.

But your brain probably can't handle actual empirical evidence on a topic. 

Look it’s late, I don’t have time to read all of that. I’m willing to accept that lying to someone can make them feel better, I do it all the time for just such a reason, but that’s not a solid basis for a society. Men can’t become women, that’s a fact. We can lie to the transvestites and tell them they’re women to spare their feelings, or we can tell the truth.

Actually…

1 hour ago, The Blood said:

I'd want to kill myself if I were you

Goddam. Maybe you are a woman, I’ve never heard a man say something so… catty!

7 minutes ago, The Blood said:

You went from "not my business" to "trans people should be in asylums" in a couple hours. You should at least keep your bigotry consistent, assuming you have enough braincells to form coherent positions.  

Look, when 40% of a group commits suicide, it only makes sense to try and correct the people who want to join that group. I was a bit hyperbolic, but a lot of so called transgenders really do need to be treated for their very serious mental disorder.

11 minutes ago, The Blood said:

I told you to be transphobic with your chest, not homophobic, wtf.

How am I homophobic? First of all I don’t fear homosexuals, they disgust me. Second of all just because I don’t surrender to the media narrative that homosexuals are totally like normal people, that doesn’t make me homophobic. Again, fuck a guy’s ass all you like, I do not care! My problem comes when people try to shove their sexuality down my throat, such as when they put it on a tv show, like I said in the post that you’re taking out of context. 

26 minutes ago, The Blood said:

Also, anyone still raging over gay people in 2023 is the actual freak who should be discouraged from public life. 

Any man who thinks he can will himself into being a woman should be locked in an insane asylum…

5 minutes ago, Edouard said:

I rarely talk about myself on the forum, I do sometimes on discord but not here however I think this could help our friend to understand some things.

I grew up in an aesthetically heterosexual environment at 200%. In the playground recreated at the age of 7 I liked to play the chef. When I saw two homosexuals kissing in a train station at about the age of 10, I didn’t even know what homosexuality was because my Catholic mother didn’t tell me it existed. I had this rather sudden thought of thinking, "Two men are unable to have feelings for each other, they’re weird, they’re actors." This thought I had naturally, because I had a family upbringing and no attraction having 10 years.

It turns out that later, around the age of 11 to 12, I realized that I was attracted to men and not women, and I tried to convince myself that I was still bisexual until I was 16, and I probably tried because of society. I did everything I could to prepare my mother for my coming out, for about two years I tried to prepare her, and in spite of all that, it went very badly. I have been subjected to real harassment from her part and my relationship with her is not tinged with love, because she loves her son as a biological being, not who I am.

I met only one boy one year older than I at the age of 17, and I’m still with him at the age of 25. Despite a long distance relationship for years I have never deceived him, I feel for him the same feelings as a man towards a woman, we are both male. He played American football and I played judo, in no case are we Hollywood products and in no case have any of us been determined. We’re both PhD students and we don’t really vote left, I’m a centrist and he’s centre-right.

Why am I saying all this? Because there are clichés and preconceived ideas, which come not only from our speaker but also from the society that must be broken. No homosexual person has not been "converted", no it is not a perverted person, no it is not a modern invention (look at Frederick, Richard the Lionheart, Alexandre and Hephaistion or emperor Hadrien for major examples), no it is not caught, no homosexuals are not forcelly trans people. You can be cisgender and homosexual and cisgender and transexual just as you can be a transgender person and heterosexual, sexual orientation and gender affiliation are two very different things. I am a man and I never had a feeling of discomfort with my gender at birth yet I am homosexual since ever.

Look, chase your zen, man, or whatever, I don’t really care. I’m sorry that your decision ruined your relationship with your mother, but I fail to see why that means I have to support your lifestyle. I have kids who are probably around your age, and I thankfully never had one turn out gay, I’m not sure how I’d respond if one of them thought they were gay.
 

Like I said, you do you, just don’t force me to accommodate it, and don’t call it marriage. I also disagree with your decision to call historical leaders homosexual, very disrespectful imo.

52 minutes ago, The Blood said:

You can't call people "freaks" and then claim you don't care about their private lives. A moral stance is a moral stance, and you should at least say it with your chest if you want to condemn trans people's state of being, rather than hand-waving about the boogeymen in society trying to, checks notes, convince you to be a decent person.

I was saying I oppose banning transvestitism from private (not public) spaces, not that I don’t have any opinion on transvestitism in general. Take it another way, I find homosexual relationships disgusting, I see a homo kiss on a television show. I decide to never support the show, the network, or the creators responsible ever again. This is me expressing my personal opinion. However if I advocate for congress passing legislation penalizing immoral media, that is me expressing a political opinion. Personal opinions, and political opinions are different - for example how many people describe themselves as “personally pro-life, but politically pro-choice”? It’s the same thing, I want transvestites as far away from me as possible, but I don’t think they should be outlawed entirely.

3 hours ago, Rezi said:

Interesting trying to distract from the "disagreements with trans ideology" at the end lmfao. No need worrying about offending anyone, this is a haven of free speech.

I’m old enough to remember the original gay ‘rights’ movement of the seventies, eighties, and nineties. Back then homosexuals, they told us that, were just like normal people, and deserved the same respect, rights, and privileges, nowadays homosexuals and their so called families are glorified in the media, and homosexuality is forced onto children as young as five years old. First it was forcing employers to hire homosexuals regardless of their beliefs, then it was demanding the government foot the bill for a disease which was caused almost exclusively by homosexual sex, until finally the homosexuals, and their liberal allies engaged in a concerted effort to tear up the holy teather-pole of western civilization: the sacred institution of marriage. In 2015 a court dominated by liberals, and so-called conservatives trampled over the average American, and the constitution in order to force a crown of thorns onto the states.

I say all this, because the exact same process - tolerate, accept, normalize, and glorify - is happening right now with regards to transvestites. In the media, in the halls of Washington, and even in our schools, we are being forced to accept the idea that men can turn themselves into women, and vice-versa. That is why I disagree with trans ideology, what some freak wants to do in their own house is their own business, but the moment it starts affecting my life, and the life of my family, then it becomes my business. Hey, I’m not saying that men should be banned from dressing like women, but I shouldn’t have to accept their mental delusion that this somehow makes them a woman, the government shouldn’t treat them as if they were women, and children shouldn’t be indoctrinated into being transvestites.

I can’t bring myself to care over who, or where we’re bombing at any given moment, so my answer to 20 and 21 is really more ‘I guess so why not’ Whatever’s happening in Africa or the Middle East has absolutely no impact on my life so I struggle to see any reason for me to care one way or another.

Stern unveils his new slogan at a rally in New Hampshire: Stern in ‘24: The Candidate for Acid, Abortion, and AR-15s

Stern campaigns in New Hampshirite, promising to rip up all gun control laws presently on the books at the federal level.

Stern says that he is the “Liberty Candidate” during a speech in New Hampshire

Stern asks Andrew Yang for his endorsement

Message: Hillary is the only candidate with the experience necessary to guide progressive legislation through a hostile congress

Attack: Attack Tulsi Gabbard for being a Putin agent of chaos

Pander: College educated young people

Campaign: Bill, and Hillary campaign among Black voters in South Carolina

Endorsement: Hillary asks Jeanne Shaheen for her endorsement

Clinton:
Hillary gives a speech in New Hampshire, pledging to defend a woman’s right to choose as President

In New Hampshire, Hillary attacks the Republican Party for their attacks on the LGBTQ community, taking DeSantis to task in particular for passing Florida’s infamous Don’t Say Gay Bill.

Hillary goes to South Carolina, promising to pass a universal background check as President.

Endorsement Request: Bill Clinton

Stern:

Howard Stern rallies in Manchester, talking about his support for abortion rights, claiming that it is inconsistent to call for small government in one regard, but then turn around, and endorse forcing women to carry a baby to term.

Stern goes to Concord, swearing that the Electoral College will be abolished “on day one.”

Continuing his New Hampshire strategy, Stern promises to end corporate welfare for oil companies.

Stern asks New Hampshire State Rep. Max Abramson for his endorsement.