AMPU Diplomacy

[vcczar]

@A man from Colorado @Arkansas Progressive @bradleyg223 @Cal @ConservativeElector2 @DakotaHale @Dobs @Hestia

@Ich_bin_Tyler @jvikings1 @Mark_W @matthewyoung123 @Murrman104 @MrPotatoTed @OrangeP47 @Pringles @Rezi @Rodja @SilentLiberty @ShortKing @themiddlepolitical @Timur @Vols21 @Willthescout7 @WVProgressive and anyone else interested. 

 

Here's Diplomacy. Immigration, Trade, Expansionism, Military things are different policy areas, so keep that in mind when looking at these. Embargos and sanctions could arguably be in trade. Ministers and ambassadors could arguably be here instead of civil service. 

Anyway, I don't think I really need to add anything to this section but I am open to ideas for Legis Props, Pres Actions, Era of the Future. 

This is the last one that I attempt to type out the prerequisites for these posts. It just slows me down typing those out and I'm in a massive hurry to get this all done. 

I hope to get Drugs, Education, and Elections policies tomorrow. On Thursday, I'll be away for much of the day. 

Diplomacy

 

No Diplomacy Legis Active

• No Active On-Going Diplomacy Legis Active (L-Ind-Default)

 

At War with this country

• Embargo Mexico (L-Dem)

• Sanction Poland (L-Fut)

• Sanction Turkey (L-Fut)

 

Relations with this nation worse than neutral

• Boycott British Goods (L-Ind)

• Sanction China (L-Fut)

• Sanction Japan (L-Fut)

• Sanction Russia (L-Pop)

 

World War II won by Allies

• Marshall Plan (L-Ide)

 

Any World War Active

• Lend-Lease Act (L-Ide)

 

Req: Dept of Agriculture Active

• Donate Agricultural Surplus Overseas (L-Ide)

 

Req: Rev War Active but Independence not yet declared

• Try to resolve war peacefully (L-Ind)

• Petition the King to Repeal the Intolerable Acts (L-Ind)

• Declaration of Causes (L-Ind)

 

Req: Rev War Active; Canadian Invasion has not occurred

• Invite Canada to join Revolution (L-Ind)

 

Req: Rev War Active:

• Seek Alliance with Anti-British Native Tribes (L-Ind)

 

Req: Authoritarian 3rd party is now major party

• Increase Foreign Aid only for nations with same political beliefs (L-Norm)

 

Req: Theocratic 3rd party is now a major party

• Subsidize state-sponsored missionaries (L-Norm)

 

Req: WWI is over and US was involved and allies won

• Demand WWI Reparations immediately (L-Prog)

 

Not putting the prereqs anymore. Takes too much time. Here’s the rest of the Diplomacy

• Formosa Resolution (L-Nuc)

• Gulf of Tonkin Resolution (L-Nuc)

• Embargo Iran (L-Neo)

• Embargo Iraq (L-Neo)

• Embargo North Korea (L-Neo)

• Good Neighbor Policy (P-Ide)

• Officially Recognize Taiwan (P-Neo)

• Globalism Over Nationalism Policy (P-Neo)

• Nationalism Over Globalism Policy (P-Neo)

• Judeo-Christian Policy in Middle East (P-Neo)

• Two-State Balance Policy in Middle East (P-Neo)

• Dollar Diplomacy (P-Prog)

• Advocate New Freedoms Policy (P-Prog)

• Fourteen Points (P-Prog)

• Stimson Doctrine (P-Prog)

• Interventionist Foreign Policy (P-Prog)

• Isolationist Foreign Policy (P-Prog)

• Monroe Doctrine (P-Rep)

• Global Funds to Fight AIDS, Malaria, etc in 3rd world (P-Ter)

• Upgrade Ministers to Ambassadors (P-Gild)

• Establish Friendly, Non-Diplomatic Relations with Taiwan (P-Nuc)

• UN Membership (P-Nuc)

• Point Four Program (P-Nuc)

• Atoms for Peace Policy (P-Nuc)

• Peace Corps (P-Nuc)

• Detente Policy w/ USSR (P-Nuc)

• Grain Embargo (P-Nuc)

• Suspend Foreign Aid to Brutal Dictators (P-Nuc)

• Ban Foreign Aid from Nations not of our same political beliefs (P-Ide)

[Vols21]

Not sure if correct section

Move Embassy in Israel to Jerusalem 

build coalition for military action (Bush in Gulf War)

intervene diplomatically to stop military aggression by allies (Eisenhower in Suez Canal conflict).  Gentle Reminder to the colonial powers that those days were over

both sides of Embargo (blockade) Cuba and restore relations and trade with Cuba.   (Could include several hostile countries and Axis of Evil)

something to mirror the Reagan-Gorbachev Summits (with possibly a random world city for the meeting place)

[vcczar]

17 minutes ago, Vols21 said:

Not sure if correct section

Move Embassy in Israel to Jerusalem 

build coalition for military action (Bush in Gulf War)

intervene diplomatically to stop military aggression by allies (Eisenhower in Suez Canal conflict).  Gentle Reminder to the colonial powers that those days were over

both sides of Embargo (blockade) Cuba and restore relations and trade with Cuba.   (Could include several hostile countries and Axis of Evil)

something to mirror the Reagan-Gorbachev Summits (with possibly a random world city for the meeting place)

Some of those are Scripted Events

[10centjimmy]

- Congressional or Presidential Delegation to x country (post conflict/disaster,  cultural exchange, listening tour, fact finding mission, big foreign policy speech like Kennedy in Germany or Trump in North Korea)

- George Kennan's Long Telegram (admin or diplomat pens the containment strategy for the Soviet Union or other "big bad" in the time period, could be an Era of the Future thing)

- naming special envoys to specific regions or crises, like Richard Holbrooke under Obama (but this kind of functions like an ambassador, so not really a big difference)

- Virtual Summits (allowing President to directly engage with counterparts in metaverse and cut out ambassadors)

- Future/ expanded military and economic alliances such as AUKUS, Indo-Pacific Agreement, TPP, etc.

- Animal/gift diplomacy (China gives National Zoo pandas in 70s)

 

 

 

 

[ShortKing]

This is more a question than an idea, I notice there's an option to have an interventionist policy versus an isolationist policy. Would there be developments that don't directly involve the US that prompt an option to respond? I assume Ukraine is not in the game, but a scenario where there is conflict between Russia and Ukraine or Armenia and Azerbaijan, would we be given an option to send military aid or provide direct support for a country of our choosing?

[Timur]

- End all foreign aid

- Withdraw from NATO

- Aid/Withdraw/Increase/Decrease aid from North Korea

- Aid/Withdraw/Increase/Decrease aid from Israel

- Aid/Withdraw/Increase/Decrease aid to Palestine

- Aid/Withdraw/Increase/Decrease aid to Saudi Arabia

- Sanction countries suspected/or known to support terrorism

- Ban/Support BDS

- Give back land to natives

- Recognize/Do not Recognize Taiwan aka. ROC

- Recognize/Do not Recognize China aka. PRC

- Recognize/Do not Recognize Western Sahara

- Recognize/Do not Recognize Israel

- Recognize/Do not Recognize Palestine

- Recognize/Do not Recognize Kosovo

- Recognize/Do not Recognize Donetsk and Luhansk Republics (for fun)

- Recognize/Do not Recognize North Korea

- Recognize/Do not Recognize Emirati of Afghanistan (Taliban government)

- Leave the UN

- Aggresive policy against Communist countries (like Goldwater)

[vcczar]

5 hours ago, ShortKing said:

This is more a question than an idea, I notice there's an option to have an interventionist policy versus an isolationist policy. Would there be developments that don't directly involve the US that prompt an option to respond? I assume Ukraine is not in the game, but a scenario where there is conflict between Russia and Ukraine or Armenia and Azerbaijan, would we be given an option to send military aid or provide direct support for a country of our choosing?

Scripted Events. That is, if I understand what you are asking.