AMPU: The Big Red Button (1960 Playtest)

[ShortKing]

Thanks for the hard work @Arkansas Progressive!

[pman]

1 hour ago, Arkansas Progressive said:

GALLUP REPORTS, House Elections (the list)

AK-1: Pman Incumbent Ralph Rivers defeats Vols Jay Hammond 51-48.
AL-1: BradleyG Incumbent Frank Boykin defeats Vols Winton Blout 52-48
AL-2: Short King Incumbent George M Grant narrowly defeats Willthescout William Louis Dickenson 50.1-49.9
AR-1: BradleyG Ezekiel Gatherings was unopposed for election.
AR-2: BradleyG Homer Martin Adkins defeats Vols John Paul Hammerschmidt 51-48.
AZ-1: OrangeP Don T Udal defeats Short King Stewart Udall 52-48.
AZ-2: Lars Lorna Lockwood defeats Short King Harold Patten 52-48. GAIN
CA-1: Willthescout William Knowland defeats BradleyG Sam Yorty 50-49. GAIN
CA-2: Lars George Murphy defeats Ted incumbent Cecil King 51-48.
CA-3: Vols Shirley Temple defeats Pman incumbent James Roosevelt 50-49.
CO-1: OrangeP incumbent William S. Hill defeats Pman Roy Romer 53-47.
CO-2: Ted Frank Evans defeats OrangeP incumbent William Chenoweth 51-48. GAIN
CT-1: Lars incumbent Horace Seely-Brown defeats Ted William St. Onge 51-49.
CT-2: Vols Ambassador to Spain John Davis Lodge wins re-election unopposed. 
DE-1: OrangeP Harry G Haskell Jr wins re-election unopposed. 
FL-1: BradleyG incumbent Bob Sikes wins re-election against Willthescout Claude R Kirk Jr 51-49.
FL-2: BradleyG incumbent Charles Edward Bennett narrowly wins re-election against Lars Bill Young 50.1-49.9.
GA-1: BradleyG incumbent Paul Brown wins re-election unopposed.
GA-2: BradleyG incumbent Carl Vinson defeats Vols Mack Mattingly 52-47.
HI-1: OrangeP Elizabeth P Farrington defeats Pman incumbent Daniel Inouye 50-49.
IA-1: Vols incumbent Harold R Gross defeats Mark Dick Clark 53-47.
IA-2: Vols John H. Kyl defeats Mark Harold Hughes 53-47.
ID-1: Lars C A Bottolfsen defeats Pman Cecil Andrus 51-48.
ID-2: Willthescout Phil Blatt defeats Mark Glen H. Taylor 50-49.
IL-1: Vols House Minority Whip Leslie C Arends defeats Pman Adlai Stevenson III 50-49.
IL-2: OrangeP Incumbent William Dawson defeats Short King Alan Dixon 51-49
IL-3: Mark incumbent Sidney Yates defeats Taylor John B Anderson 50-49.
IN-1: Vols House Minority Leader Charles Halleck defeats Mark John Brademas 52-48.
IN-2: Lars Edgar Whitcomb defeats Short King Ray J. Madden 50.1-49.9
KS-1: OrangeP incumbent Garner Shriver defeats Pman John M Houston 52-48
KS-2: Willthescout Bob Dole was elected unopposed.
KY-1: Short King incumbent Brent Spence defeats Vols Jim Bunning 51-48.
KY-2: Short King incumbent William Natcher defeats OrangeP Tim Lee Carter 51-49.
LA-1: Short King incumbent F Edward Hebert won re-election unopposed.
LA-2: BradleyG incumbent Speedy Long wins re-election unopposed.
MA-1: Willthescout Joseph W Martin defeats Pman Tip O'Neil 50-49.
MA-2: Pman Majority Leader John W. McCormack defeats Tyler Margaret Heckler 50-49.
MA-3: Short King Philip Philbin narrowly defeats OrangeP Edith Rogers 51-48.
MD-1: Vols Lawrence Hogan defeats Short King Daniel Brewster 50-49. GAIN
MD-2: OrangeP Marjorie Holt defeats Mark incumbent George Fallon 52-48 GAIN
ME-1: Vols incumbent Robert S Hale defeats Short King John Reede 50-49.
ME-2: Willthescout Owen Brewster defeats Pman Sumner Sewell 51-49.
MI-1: Willthescout Robert Griffin defeats Ted John Swainson 52-48.
MI-2: Vols incumbent Gerald Ford defeats Pman Gov Soapy Williams 52-48.
MI-3: Lars Homer S Ferguson defeats Mark incumbent John Dingell 50-49. GAIN
MN-1 Ted incumbent John Blatnick defeats OrangeP Odin Langden 50.1-49.9
MN-2: Pman Rudy Perpich defeats Tyler incumbent Al Quie 51-49.
MO-1: Willthescout incumbent Dewey J Short defeats Pman Rep Clarence Cannon 50-49.
MO-2: BradleyG James W Symington defeats Willthescout Phyllis Schlafly 59-41.
MS-1: BradleyG John Bell Williams is elected unopposed
MS-2: BradleyG incumbent Jamie Whitten is re-elected unopposed
MT-1: Willthescout Stan Stevens defeats Pman incumbent Lee Metcalf 52-48. GAIN
MT-2: Willthescout Tim Babcock defeats BradleyG John Melcher 51-49.
NC-1: BradleyG Sam Ervin III defeats Willthescout James East 50-49.
NC-2: BradleyG incumbent Herbert C Bonner is re-elected unopposed
NC-3: BradleyG Jesse Helms is elected unopposed.
ND-1: Tyler Fred Andahal defeats Short King William L Guy 56-43
NE-1: Vols Howard Buffett wins election unopposed
NE-2: Tyler incumbent Glen Cunningham defeats Pman Harry B Coffee 59-41
NH-1: Lars incumbent Chester Morrow wins re-election unopposed.
NJ-1: Lars Peter Frelinghuysen Jr defeats Ted incumbent Peter W Rodino 51-48. GAIN
NJ-2: Tyler J Parnell Thomas wins election unopposed
NJ-3: Willthescout Nicholas F Brady wins election unopposed.
NM-1: Ted Joseph Montoya defeats Tyler Manuel Lujan Jr 59-40
NM-2: Pman incumbent Fabien Chavez Jr defeats Vols Joe Skeen 52-48.
NV-1: Short King incumbent Walter S Baring Jr defeats Willthescout Chic Hecht 51-49.
NY-1: Willthescout Hamilton Fish III defeats Mark incumbent Victor Anfuso 51-48. GAIN
NY-2: Willthescout William Miller defeats Pman Robert F Kennedy  50-49.
NY-3: Willthescout Barber Conable defeats Mark Gore Vidal 51-48.
OH-1: Vols incumbent Del Latta defeats Mark Rep. Michael Kirwan 52-47
OH-2: Willthescout John Ashbrook defeats Pman Louis Stokes 50-49 GAIN
OH-3: Vols incumbent Clarence Brown defeats Pman Howard Metzenbaum 52-47
OK-1: BradleyG Victor Wickersham is elected unopposed.
OK-2: Vols Paige Belcher defeats Mark Ed Edmondson 50-49 GAIN
OR-1: Lars incumbent A W Norbald defeats Short King Robert B Duncan 52-48
OR-2: Tyler John H Hall defeats Mark James H Weaver 54-46.
PA-1: OrangeP John C Kunkel defeats Pman Robert NC Nix Jr. 53-47
PA-2: Lars Ivor Fenton defeats Ted Thomas Morgan 51-49
PA-3: Short King incumbent William Green Jr defeats OrangeP Thomas M Foglietta 52-47
RI-1: Mark Claiborne Pell defeats Lars William Vanderbilt III 50-49
RI-2: Short King Joseph A Bevilacqua Sr is elected unopposed.
SC-1: BradleyG L Mendel Rivers is elected unopposed
SC-2: Short King Donald S Russell defeats Willthescout Arthur Ravenel Jr 50-49
SD-1: Lars John Gurney defeats Mark George McGovern 52-47
TN-1: Vols Bill Brock defeats Mark William R Anderson 52-47 GAIN
TN-2: Willthescout John Duncan defeats Ted Robert Bass 50-49
TX-1: BradleyG incumbent Wright Patman defeats Tyler George W Bush 50.1-49.9
TX-2: Short King incumbent Olin Teague defeats Willthescout Bruce Alger 51-48
TX-3: BradleyG incumbent Martin Dies Jr is unopposed for re-election.
UT-1: Tyler William Dawson defeats Mark Abe Murdock 52-48
VA-1: BradleyG Burr Harrison defeats Tyler J Kenneth Robinson 51-49
VA-2: Willthescout John Warner defeats BradleyG incumbent Howard W Smith 51-49
VT-1: Tyler Robert W Mallary defeats Ted Phillip Hoff 51-48
WA-1: Short King Brock Adams defeats Tyler incumbent Walt Horan 50.1-49.9
WA-2: Ted Tom Foley defeats OrangeP incumbent Thor Tollefson 50.1-49.9
WI-1: OrangeP Gardner Withrow defeats Pman Robert Kastenmeier 52-48.
WI-2: Tyler John Byrnes defeats Ted F Ryan Duffy 50-49.
WV-1: Ted incumbent Harley Orrin is re-elected unopposed
WV-2: Mark Ken Hechler is elected unopposed
WY-1: OrangeP Kieth Thomson is re-elected over Mark Teno Roncalio 54-46.

@Lars @Willthescout7 @ShortKing @pman @Mark_W @bradleyg223 @Ich_bin_Tyler @Vols21 @OrangeP47 

I was pretty close to having a decent night—- I lost some tough close ones. Thanks for the hard work making this!

Edited May 14, 2022 by pman

[Arkansas Progressive]

31 minutes ago, pman said:

I was pretty close to having a decent nice—- I lost some tough close ones. Thanks for the hard work making this!

Ain't no problem

[Arkansas Progressive]

House votes

[pman]

28 minutes ago, Arkansas Progressive said:

House votes

I just don't see any correlation between winning liberal states in the north and anything about the Republicans in the 1960 election. The same is true of the Presidential election. The USA had liberals in 1960 and I don't believe they would have supported the GOP platform or the top of their ticket. I get there were liberal Republicans in 1960 but not enough to support a sweep like that. Anyway, I am not complaining---I am just trying to see what I missed. I am sure a data person will explain it to me, lol.

[Vols21]

On 5/14/2022 at 12:44 AM, Arkansas Progressive said:

GALLUP REPORTS, 1960 Senate election primaries (so I can ping ya'll easier)

VA: Vols William L Scott (R) faces BradleyG Incumbent Absalom Willis Robertson (D).
 

If you read the Senate results below, it says Absalom wins the Senate race unopposed.   The election page showed he rolled a 1 so I might have had a small chance to win that one.   accidents happen, so just wanted to raise a protests that my votes were not properly counted.  🙂

[Arkansas Progressive]

4 minutes ago, Vols21 said:

If you read the Senate results below, it says Absalom wins the Senate race unopposed.   The election page showed he rolled a 1 so I might have had a small chance to win that one.   accidents happen, so just wanted to raise a protests that my votes were not properly counted.  🙂

Yep lemme look.

I stand corrected. 
VA: @bradleyg223 Absalom Willis Robertson defeats @Vols21 William L Scott 51-48.

[Vols21]

5 hours ago, pman said:

I just don't see any correlation between winning liberal states in the north and anything about the Republicans in the 1960 election. The same is true of the Presidential election. The USA had liberals in 1960 and I don't believe they would have supported the GOP platform or the top of their ticket. I get there were liberal Republicans in 1960 but not enough to support a sweep like that. Anyway, I am not complaining---I am just trying to see what I missed. I am sure a data person will explain it to me, lol.

I'll have to go back and read our platform since most of that was done while I was out of action.  But I remember asking for a plank that would appeal to liberals too since the meter was very close (and our issue was enough to bring liberals into the fold (I don't remember specifics because I just glanced at it, but it seems that the meter for liberals came to the red side from neutral).    Couple that with the New York Rockefeller / Country Club Republicans (the liberal factions) who made a good showing the northern states.   With our "conservative slant" you'd think we'd been able to win more in the Southern states but came up empty there.    Even lost in the new Vice President's home state to a conservative Democrat.  win some/lose some.

[Vols21]

On 5/12/2022 at 11:38 PM, MrPotatoTed said:

Agree.  I'm also thinking the D6 roll at the end should maybe be D3, and the historical bias should be +3/+5 instead of +1/+2, maybe.  Would give more realistic outcomes, less left to just literal random luck.  

I've missed a lot of the discussion over the "platform" effects on the game.    In modern era, the platform is just a piece of paper written by the policy wonks during convention - but for game purposes I look at it as the campaign talking points for the candidate, ie. what issues is he campaigning on (build the wall, universal healthcare, no new taxes, drill baby drill, green energy initiatives, etc.)  I think issues do resonate with the voters.  And there are consequences when they fail to deliver when elected (Bush broke his famous "read my lips" and got beat for re-election).   -- maybe instead of platform, it's called something else in the more recent era if the term is a sticking point.  The "issues' part still seems pertinent.

with the actual data and formulas hidden in the game, it will be harder to create a perfect platform (and could create some cross talk between players which generates a buzz).    One other thing that could help (even in playtest if Cal wanted) is to randomly select a handful of (maybe 3-5) issues which are most important to voters and some that are not as important.   These would be unknown.   If you get lucky and find the right ones, you'd get a bonus.  While if you spend all your time talking about things that are not resonating, you're basically wasting your time (and not getting much of a campaign boost).  The others would have the standard boost.   The one thing I never want is a cookie cutter platform that always works.  or even a cookie cutter game where the outcome is pre-determined or heavily slanted in one direction (so that a certain type candidate always wins).  It's kind of like a wrestling game I play - if one guy is rated to win every match he fights, it becomes pointless to even play his matches.    But when there is way to plan and exploit an opponent's weakness or drive home your strengths, then it becomes interesting and stays that way.   It looks like you are backtesting some different ideas on the past elections, and that is a great approach.

The early playtest broke the mold when it comes to being historical (most of the original Founding Fathers were non-existent getting overwhelmed at every turn).   Frustrating in a way, but also fun to see what new leaders emerge (I tell all my friends about President Arnold when I explain the game, and now I can show them what we are doing in 1960.  It gets them excited about the game.

[Lars]

I just noticed that I knocked McGovern out of the House.

 

You're welcome, Democrats.

[pman]

4 hours ago, Vols21 said:

I've missed a lot of the discussion over the "platform" effects on the game.    In modern era, the platform is just a piece of paper written by the policy wonks during convention - but for game purposes I look at it as the campaign talking points for the candidate, ie. what issues is he campaigning on (build the wall, universal healthcare, no new taxes, drill baby drill, green energy initiatives, etc.)  I think issues do resonate with the voters.  And there are consequences when they fail to deliver when elected (Bush broke his famous "read my lips" and got beat for re-election).   -- maybe instead of platform, it's called something else in the more recent era if the term is a sticking point.  The "issues' part still seems pertinent.

with the actual data and formulas hidden in the game, it will be harder to create a perfect platform (and could create some cross talk between players which generates a buzz).    One other thing that could help (even in playtest if Cal wanted) is to randomly select a handful of (maybe 3-5) issues which are most important to voters and some that are not as important.   These would be unknown.   If you get lucky and find the right ones, you'd get a bonus.  While if you spend all your time talking about things that are not resonating, you're basically wasting your time (and not getting much of a campaign boost).  The others would have the standard boost.   The one thing I never want is a cookie cutter platform that always works.  or even a cookie cutter game where the outcome is pre-determined or heavily slanted in one direction (so that a certain type candidate always wins).  It's kind of like a wrestling game I play - if one guy is rated to win every match he fights, it becomes pointless to even play his matches.    But when there is way to plan and exploit an opponent's weakness or drive home your strengths, then it becomes interesting and stays that way.   It looks like you are backtesting some different ideas on the past elections, and that is a great approach.

The early playtest broke the mold when it comes to being historical (most of the original Founding Fathers were non-existent getting overwhelmed at every turn).   Frustrating in a way, but also fun to see what new leaders emerge (I tell all my friends about President Arnold when I explain the game, and now I can show them what we are doing in 1960.  It gets them excited about the game.

I agree with a lot of this, especially hiding the meters and having 3-5 issues which are most important to voters.

[Willthescout7]

Excited to see that the options to turn off historical biases has been included! For me at least that will add a ton of replayability

[pman]

@Cal@MrPotatoTed@vcczar

I have a specific question about civil rights in the 1960 election and more broadly about what role civil rights (and other social movements) will play going forward.

Unless I am missing something with the sheets (which is entirely possible), it seems like the game greatly undervalues the impact civil rights had on American politics in the 1960s. For example, in the 1960 election, when MLK was arrested in Georgia, JFK called Coretta Scott King, and Bobby Kennedy worked behind the scenes to secure MLK's release, signaling to the African American community that JFK supported civil rights despite the Dixiecrats in the party --  and this was a factor in Kennedy's victory.

I know we don't have one-off events like that in the game and neither party focused on civil rights in their platforms but it seems as if civil rights is undervalued in the points totals for potential legislation. For example, the 1964 Civil Rights Act doesn't seem to have as big an impact on the electorate as banning workplace discrimination for 40 and over. Obviously the Civil Rights Act of 64 should have both positives and negative electoral consequences (the Dixiecrats leaving the party but Democrats solidifying support from African American and liberal voters). Moreover, while the CR Act and VR Act (1965) mattered a great deal, many successes of the civil rights movement were in the form of federal enforcement of existing laws (such as ICC enforcement as a result of the Freedom Rides).  

 

https://time.com/4817240/martin-luther-king-john-kennedy-phone-call/

[MrPotatoTed]

51 minutes ago, pman said:

@Cal@MrPotatoTed@vcczar

I have a specific question about civil rights in the 1960 election and more broadly about what role civil rights (and other social movements) will play going forward.

Unless I am missing something with the sheets (which is entirely possible), it seems like the game greatly undervalues the impact civil rights had on American politics in the 1960s. For example, in the 1960 election, when MLK was arrested in Georgia, JFK called Coretta Scott King, and Bobby Kennedy worked behind the scenes to secure MLK's release, signaling to the African American community that JFK supported civil rights despite the Dixiecrats in the party --  and this was a factor in Kennedy's victory.

I know we don't have one-off events like that in the game and neither party focused on civil rights in their platforms but it seems as if civil rights is undervalued in the points totals for potential legislation. For example, the 1964 Civil Rights Act doesn't seem to have as big an impact on the electorate as banning workplace discrimination for 40 and over. Obviously the Civil Rights Act of 64 should have both positives and negative electoral consequences (the Dixiecrats leaving the party but Democrats solidifying support from African American and liberal voters). Moreover, while the CR Act and VR Act (1965) mattered a great deal, many successes of the civil rights movement were in the form of federal enforcement of existing laws (such as ICC enforcement as a result of the Freedom Rides).  

 

https://time.com/4817240/martin-luther-king-john-kennedy-phone-call/

There's definitely one-off events (that have a % chance of firing within a given era, not tied to a specific year.  Whether we have that specific event or not, I'd have to defer to @vcczar as he made the events.

[pman]

3 minutes ago, MrPotatoTed said:

There's definitely one-off events (that have a % chance of firing within a given era, not tied to a specific year.  Whether we have that specific event or not, I'd have to defer to @vcczar as he made the events.

Cool, thanks! Am I wrong about how CR acts are counted? If not, I think we might want to consider weighing them more or CR will never get passed. Just a suggestion!

[MrPotatoTed]

3 minutes ago, pman said:

Cool, thanks! Am I wrong about how CR acts are counted? If not, I think we might want to consider weighing them more or CR will never get passed. Just a suggestion!

No idea, I haven't explored 1960 at all.  Haha.  All my hands on experience comes from the 1772 playthrough.  I'd have to defer to Vcczar or Cal, but I think they're both pretty busy right now.  

[matthewyoung123]

2 hours ago, pman said:

@Cal@MrPotatoTed@vcczar

I have a specific question about civil rights in the 1960 election and more broadly about what role civil rights (and other social movements) will play going forward.

Unless I am missing something with the sheets (which is entirely possible), it seems like the game greatly undervalues the impact civil rights had on American politics in the 1960s. For example, in the 1960 election, when MLK was arrested in Georgia, JFK called Coretta Scott King, and Bobby Kennedy worked behind the scenes to secure MLK's release, signaling to the African American community that JFK supported civil rights despite the Dixiecrats in the party --  and this was a factor in Kennedy's victory.

I know we don't have one-off events like that in the game and neither party focused on civil rights in their platforms but it seems as if civil rights is undervalued in the points totals for potential legislation. For example, the 1964 Civil Rights Act doesn't seem to have as big an impact on the electorate as banning workplace discrimination for 40 and over. Obviously the Civil Rights Act of 64 should have both positives and negative electoral consequences (the Dixiecrats leaving the party but Democrats solidifying support from African American and liberal voters). Moreover, while the CR Act and VR Act (1965) mattered a great deal, many successes of the civil rights movement were in the form of federal enforcement of existing laws (such as ICC enforcement as a result of the Freedom Rides).  

 

https://time.com/4817240/martin-luther-king-john-kennedy-phone-call/

There were also some Southern Democrats who wouldn't vote for Kennedy because he was a Catholic.

[pman]

Nobody's Home:

What does a loss look like? Where does the faction go without Tip driving the bus and Hubert eating his cheese? What does a faction do when it gets devastated? How do they move forward while figuring out what went wrong? That's what happened at the historic Strodsmoor Country Inn high atop the mountains in the Pocono.

Governor David L Lawrence: Thanks for coming everyone, Welcome to the Poconos. So, lets figure this thing out.

Rudy Perpich: What's there to figure out? We got crushed. Tip lost. Hubert lost. RFK lost. FDR Jr lost. Honestly, I don't know how I won.

Foster Furcolo: Yeah, America is lost. It's lost. And I won for crying out lost and I still think it's lost. 

J Millard Tawes: It's not lost. It just took a rightward turn. Personally, I think we need to become a moderate faction. If you can't beat them, join them. Heck, let's become conservative Democrats. They had a good night.

Stephen McNichols slams his fist on the table, gets up, walks to the corner, walks back to the table and gives an eloquent defense of American liberalism: Listen, we liberals fed people during the Great Depression, we liberals gave people jobs and dignity through the CCC, TVA and of course the WPA. We liberals stabilized the banks through the FDIC and YES we liberals de-segregated the military under Truman. Pretty soon we'll be saying we liberals made a Republican's dream of a more equal America reality. I rather lose as a liberal than win as a conservative.

Michael DiSalle rolls his eyes and opines: Well that was a beautiful damn speech but it won't get me re-elected in Ohio. I think we pick a moderate faction leader and all turn right with the country. Or we can keep losing. Yeah, let's do that. Let's keep losing.

Paul Douglas: I love you Mike but you're wrong. It was one bad election.

Michael DiSalle: It's been more than 1 bad election. When we last had power people got their news by carrier pigeons.

Paul Douglas: haha, well, they used those in WW2, right? So you're technically right. Regardless, I am not a flip flopper. 

Governor David L Lawrence: Gentlemen, as your host I think we need to take a break. 

Michael DiSalle: But we need to pick a new faction leader and come up with a draft order

Governor David L Lawrence: Yeah, I know. But I booked us a tour of the Poconos PA: No. 9 Coal Mine & Museum. Maybe we'll find some clarity down there in the cave. 

Down into the cave the defeated faction went. Fitting. You can't make this up. The event will go down in history as the great coal mine conference. Right up there with Brenton Woods. 

 

 

 

Edited May 15, 2022 by pman

[Vols21]

5 hours ago, pman said:

Cool, thanks! Am I wrong about how CR acts are counted? If not, I think we might want to consider weighing them more or CR will never get passed. Just a suggestion!

It may be something like admitting new states in the early playtest.     Certain parties or factions will fight to block it, but if the other side gains enough power it will pass.   It’s incentive for that side to win races at the state level in their strongholds.    Remember in real life, it was the southern block of democrats who resisted and always voted against the Civil Rights.    The bill itself doesn’t really need more weight, it’s the cross party cooperation that helped to pass it.

[pman]

Just now, Vols21 said:

It may be something like admitting new states in the early playtest.     Certain parties or factions will fight to block it, but if the other side gains enough power it will pass.   It’s incentive for that side to win races at the state level in their strongholds.    Remember in real life, it was the southern block of democrats who resisted and always voted against the Civil Rights.    The bill itself doesn’t really need more weight, it’s the cross party cooperation that helped to pass it.

Very true, that and MLK, the civil rights activists and LBJ having steel for a spine. So @ShortKingball's in your court. I do think the game seems to undervalue the role of social movements like civil rights but we'll see how it plays out as we get going!

[Arkansas Progressive]

INDIANA ELECTIONS BOARD

@Willthescout7 Incumbent Gov. Harold Handley has been substituted out for Robert D Orr as Handley has reached his term limit. Orr still defeats Welsh.

Edited May 16, 2022 by Arkansas Progressive

[Arkansas Progressive]

Bonuses Governor elections

Faubus, +1 Admin, Economics
Fanin, +1 Admin, Environment
Lardswell, +1 Gov
Jones Sr, +1 Gov
Gregg, +1 Gov
Notte Jr, +1 Gov
Stevenson, +1 Gov
Sprouse, +1 Gov
Stratton, Agriculture, Controversial, Unlikeable, Iron Fist
Davis, Labor

Penalties Below

Winthrop Rockefeller
Herschel C Loveless
Richard J Daley
Matthew E Welsh
George Docking
Frank M Coffin
Philip Hart
John W King
Christopher del Sesto
Philip Hoff
Patrick Lucey

All get -1 in elections for the next six years

[Arkansas Progressive]

Senate elections bonuses and penalties

James Broyhill 
Tom McCall 

+1 Admin

Jeremiah Denton
Gordon Allott
J Caleb Boggs
Benjamin A Smith
Margaret Chase Smith
Styles Bridges
Clifford P Case
Theodore F Green
Strom Thurmond
Karl Mundt
Cecil H Underwood
Alan K Simpson

+1 Legis

Denton, Business
Bridges, Business
Case, Labor
Boggs, Naval
Mundt, Housing
Simpson, Science
Thurmond, Transportation
M. Smith, Healthcare
Underwood, Healthcare
Allot, Naval
B. Smith, Healthcare
Green, Military

Cecil Underwood, +1 Gov

Maggie Smith gains Controversial
Styles Bridges gains Iron fist

Bob Bartlett
Wayne N Aspinall
Bo Callaway
James Exon
Frank Lautenberg
David Cargo
Dewey Bartlett
John Tower
Joseph O'Mahoney

-1 in elections for next six years

[Lars]

5 hours ago, Arkansas Progressive said:

Philip Hart

Just to confirm, is that Phillip H Weaver?

[Arkansas Progressive]

3 hours ago, Lars said:

Just to confirm, is that Phillip H Weaver?

Yes